If constitutional food could be voted Homecoming King , it seems like it would take home the crown . Reports from the Organic Trade Association and the USDA show organic consumption and yield is up . phthisis , though , is outpacing production , drive the U.S. to import more constitutive intellectual nourishment , which might not necessarily be the best thing . And while the USDA is seek novel members for its National Organic Standards Board , industry groups are suing the authority for crummy rule - making insurance policy .
There are now 19,474 certified - organic operations in the U.S. , a 5 percent increase in the past year and more - than 250 percent gain since 2002 , when theNational Organic Program was started . This increase in farmers is n’t enough to keep up with the increase in organic - production requirement . The U.S. saw an 11.3 percent increment in the sale of constitutional product ( food for thought and nonfood ) between 2013 and 2014 . That’s$39.1 billion in salesand does n’t let in the mammy - and - pop raiser who stand by nonsynthetic mean of production but are n’t certified . This increase is happen across the country , too : 68 to almost 80 per centum of households in southerly land are buying constitutive , and about 90 percent of family on the West Coast and in New England shell out for organic . Organic now has almost 5 percent of the market portion of food sale , and 12 percent of all produce sold in this country is organic .
Because of this speedy evolution , not all of the organic products found here are of U.S. origin . Organic corn whiskey and soy , in particular , are being importedfor livestock feed . Clearly , the demand is present , and with organic corn whisky selling for more than triple the price of nonorganic corn , more U.S. farmers might get taking vantage of the securities industry .

I see the impact of organic use outpace product every day . It ’s implausibly hard to get even non - genetically qualify livestock provender where I live in rural Kentucky , let alone Certified Organic grains . Think about the give and take of this situation : Part of the drive behind organic production is a lower environmental impact . If we ’re shipping clavus from Romania , Turkey , the Netherlands , Canada , Argentina and India to course our organic livestock , we ’re not doing the environmental footprint of our food any favors . There ’s a craft - off .
“ Organic ” Is n’t Perfect
It ’s potential that even with all of this consumer documentation , the organic label is n’t what it was signify to be . There are two pending lawsuits against the USDA National Organic Program regarding alteration made to organic - standards normal without due process .

Thefirst suitwas filed by the Center for Food Safety earlier this month , stating the Union rule - making process was violate when the USDA change established procedure for allow substances used in grow organic solid food . Specifically , the USDA get rid of a “ sunset supplying , ” which requires all materials to cycle off the National List of Allowed and Prohibited Substances every five age unless the National Organic Standards Board balloting by a two - tierce legal age to relist them based on public stimulus , new science and available choice . Now , materials can remain on the list without any condom review unless the NOSB withdraw the initiative to vote it off the list . This major policy change was made without a public gossip period of time — I’m guessing because the public would be pretty upturned about a insurance alteration like this and likely would n’t agree to it .
Thesecond cause , file a calendar week after the first , has CFS , theCenter for Environmental HealthandBeyond Pesticideschallenging the NOP ’s failure to follow the law in making another big organic - standards rule alteration : Producers can use compost that has been care for with man-made pesticides . ( Is this stillorganicthat we ’re talking about here ? )
Now that there are two major rules being changed by the USDA without further input , there ’s a definite figure emerge . While I ’m not one for litigation , these are not excessive lawsuit . consumer and producers need to know the NOP standards are being upheld and are systematically monitor . Changing them willy - nilly like this decrease everyone ’s confidence in the home organic recording label .
Think you may Do well ?
The USDA has put out acall for novel membersof the National Organic Standards Board . This board recommend whether substances should be allowed or prohibited in constitutional yield or treatment , assists in formulate touchstone for substances used in constituent output , and advises the secretary of agriculture about organic regulations .
There are five spots open on the 15 - member card : two for farmers , two for consumer / public - involvement representatives and one for a USDA - recognize certifying broker . If chosen , you ’ll have a five - yr terminal figure that set out Jan. 24 , 2016 . You have until May 15 , 2015 , to subject a written nomination , including a blanket varsity letter , résumé and required kind , plus any endorsement or letters of recommendation you want to admit . Send it to Rita Meade , USDA – AMS – NOP , 1400 Independence Ave . , SW . , Room 2648 – S , Ag Stop 0268 , Washington , D.C. 20250 . you’re able to adjoin Meade at 202 - 720 - 3252 orRita.Meade@ams.usda.govwith question .
« More The News Hog »